UTEP Miners 7 · New Mexico Lobos 61
2026-10-03 · University Stadium (NM)
University Stadium (NM) · 2026-10-03
The final score was UTEP Miners 7 · New Mexico Lobos 61. The breakdown below uses this game’s figures, separate from season averages.
UTEP Miners
New Mexico LobosThe scoring path
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTEP Miners | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| New Mexico Lobos | 14 | 7 | 16 | 24 | 61 |
| Measure | UTEP Miners | New Mexico Lobos |
|---|---|---|
| First downs | 11 | 24 |
| Total yards | 270 | 492 |
| Passing yards | 101 | 262 |
| Rushing yards | 169 | 230 |
| Third-down conversions | 4-12 | 7-12 |
| Giveaways | 5 | 1 |
| Possession time | 28:32 | 31:28 |
Third-down conversion is shown as its own measure. It is not a substitute for overall play success rate. A dash means the source did not supply that field.
The Lab’s result test
New Mexico Lobos won by 54 points. Q4 supplied the largest scoring swing in the winner’s favor, a +17-points period. The chart shows the result’s path; the box score helps explain what created it.
UTEP Miners produced 270 total yards; New Mexico Lobos produced 492. Yardage describes how much ground was gained, not whether the most valuable drives were finished.
New Mexico Lobos committed 1 giveaways against the opponent’s 5. That possession advantage gave the winner fewer mistakes to overcome.
The next test is repeatability. Separate staying on schedule from long gains, then examine field position and drive finishing. A large yardage total can coexist with missed scoring chances; a short field can make a modest drive valuable.
Our game coverage
A matching published game video is not available in the verified archive yet.